ARID
net: Assessment, Research,
and Integration of Desertification research network

Español

Home

What is Desertification?

Drylands Development
Paradigm (DDP)

Meetings

Governance

Publications

Links

Miscellaneous

Contacts

Research Coordination Networks in Biological Sciences (RCN)

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0234186. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF)

Drylands Development Paradigm (DDP)

The DDP addresses the livelihoods of human populations in drylands, via the study of coupled human-ecological (H-E) systems. It is a product of a diverse array of research in desertification, vulnerability, poverty alleviation, and community development and consists of 5 principles, all of which have implications for research and management in drylands. From Reynolds et al. (2007) based on Stafford Smith and Reynolds (2002).

Principles [P]

Key Implications (i) for Research, Management and Policy


P1
:
H-E systems are coupled, dynamic and co-adapting, so that their structure, function and interrelationships change over time


i1
: Understanding dryland desertification and development issues always requires the simultaneous consideration of both human and ecological drivers


P2
: A limited suite of ‘slow’ variables are critical determinants of H-E system dynamics


i2
: A limited suite of critical processes and variables at any scale makes a complex problem tractable

P3: Thresholds in key slow variables define different states of H-E systems, often with different controlling processes; thresholds may change over time

 

i3: The costs of intervention rise non-linearly with increasing land degradation or the degree of socioeconomic dysfunction; yet high variability means great uncertainty in detecting thresholds, implying that managers should invoke the precautionary principle

P4: Coupled H-E systems are hierarchical, nested and networked across multiple scales

 

i4: H-E systems must be managed at the appropriate scale; cross-scale linkages are important in this, but are often remote and weak in drylands, requiring special institutional attention

P5: The maintenance of a body of up-to-date LEK is key to functional co-adaptation of H-E systems

i5: The development of scientific and LEK must be accelerated both for local management and regional policy