
ARIDnet: Assessment, Research,
and Integration of Desertification research
network
Español
Home
What is Desertification?
Drylands Development
Paradigm (DDP)
Meetings
Governance
Publications
Links
Miscellaneous
Contacts
Research Coordination Networks in Biological Sciences (RCN)
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0234186. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF)
|
Drylands Development Paradigm
(DDP)
The DDP addresses the livelihoods of human populations in drylands, via the study of coupled human-ecological (H-E) systems. It is a product of a diverse array of research in desertification, vulnerability, poverty alleviation, and community development
and consists of 5 principles, all of which have implications for research and management in drylands. From Reynolds et al. (2007) based on Stafford Smith and Reynolds (2002).
Principles [P] |
Key Implications (i) for Research, Management and Policy |
P1: H-E systems are coupled, dynamic and co-adapting, so that their structure, function and interrelationships change over time
|
i1: Understanding dryland desertification and development issues always requires the simultaneous consideration of both human and ecological drivers
|
P2: A limited suite of ‘slow’ variables are critical determinants of H-E system dynamics
|
i2: A limited suite of critical processes and variables at any scale makes a complex problem tractable
|
P3: Thresholds in key slow variables define different states of H-E systems, often with different controlling processes; thresholds may change over time
|
i3: The costs of intervention rise non-linearly with increasing land degradation or the degree of socioeconomic dysfunction; yet high variability means great uncertainty in detecting thresholds, implying that managers should invoke the precautionary principle |
P4: Coupled H-E systems are hierarchical, nested and networked across multiple scales
|
i4: H-E systems must be managed at the appropriate scale; cross-scale linkages are important in this, but are often remote and weak in drylands, requiring special institutional attention |
P5: The maintenance of a body of up-to-date LEK is key to functional co-adaptation of H-E systems
|
i5: The development of scientific and LEK must be accelerated both for local management and regional policy |
|
|